Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Gay Marriage: Common Sense is not so Common



Gay Marriage: 
Common Sense is not so Common


The LGBTQ community deserves absolute support in their pursuit for social and legal equality, and it is utterly ridiculous that we are still arguing about gay marriage, such a thing should be common sense. There is no logical reason why two consenting adults should not be able to do anything they like with each other, including get married. The gender or sex of the people involved is no one’s business and is of no consequence to anyone outside of that marriage. This is not just a matter of gay rights; it is a matter of civil rights and personal freedoms.

The illusion that gay marriage affects everyone, or anyone, is absurd. Gay marriage has never caused a heterosexual marriage to fail unless one of the people in the couple wasn’t really straight in the first place. Certainly infidelity and divorce are far greater threats to “the sanctity” of marriage than two gay individuals getting married, but there are no riots on the street to have cheating and divorce criminalized or banned. There is also no public outcry for an end to cousins marrying. It is legal in all fifty states to marry your second cousin and twenty states allow first cousins to marry ("National conference of," 2012).

Sometimes there are not two equally valid sides of an argument...sometimes there is right and sometimes there is wrong, these are called facts. Everyone is entitled to have opinions....but that "it’s just my opinion" nonsense, coming from those who regard homosexuality as evil, usually comes from someone who was caught in a logical corner and has nothing else to say. Your freedom of opinion ends when that opinion in action threatens to violate someone else’s freedoms and rights. Those that oppose gay marriage are not simply "stating their opinion", they are promoting a platform if hate, ignorance, and prejudice and they mean to use that platform to oppress certain people and force their own view of proper societal conformity.

Of course people can have their own opinions about movies, music, food, art, etc...but it is crossing the bounds of reason with the "right to your opinion" thing when your opinion is that it is okay to discriminate a particular group of people and deny them equal rights and protections under the law....these are not okay opinions to have, and certainly no opinion is beyond the realm of criticism. When I hear, “that is my opinion and it is my right to have it", my thoughts are, ‘Yes, maybe, and it is my right to call you on your opinions and criticize their logical and moral flaws, and I will fight your opinions tooth and nail if they at all threaten to affect anyone in a negative way.’

Christians always point to the bible to justify their hatred of homosexuals, but the religious often nitpick through their scriptures looking for passages that justify their desired actions and ignore the passages that are an inconvenience to them. Christians typically ignore the passages condemning tattoos, mixed cloth, shellfish, and women talking ("I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man. She must be quiet." -God (1 Timothy 2:12)) and go right to the passages about stoning homosexuals to death. It is also true that Jesus is not known to have ever said anything about homosexuality, even the orators that told his story never claimed he said anything about it, but even if he had….so what? The bible, and supposedly god, condones slavery ("Slaves, be subject to your masters with all reverence, not only to those who are good and equitable but also to those who are perverse." (1 Peter 2:18)), rampant misogyny, polygamy, killing innocent children, massacring entire cities, flooding the whole world, and a myriad of violence in its entire splendor, "Go, now, attack Amalek, and deal with him and all that he has under the ban. Do not spare him, but kill men and women, children and infants, oxen and sheep, camels and asses." -God (1 Samuel 15:3). The bible is not personally where I would go to find perfect moral guidance.

If you still believe that being gay is evil I cannot stop you from thinking that way, but it really should not be a concern of yours (if you are not gay) so why interfere in the lives of others? There are couples BEGGING to be allowed to marry their loved one and not have to move to another state away from their friends and family to do it. You can live your own life by whatever code you choose, but if they want to rot in hell for all eternity, let them do it, it is their choice. No one should have the right to force their faith and beliefs on other people, especially by passing or supporting legislation that would restrict the freedoms of others.

Let’s suppose for a moment that gay marriage was bringing forth this change in the definition of marriage. I consider that to be a good thing, as marriage was traditionally intended to be a contract of an exchange of ownership. Men have, through most of history, legally OWNED their daughter’s and wives and could sell off their daughters like slaves. In many cases it was the prospective husband who had to procure a sum of money or goods to trade for a bride, but in some cultures, like parts of Europe, a “dowry” was required of the father to give to the husband upon a marriage agreement, making females a lowly burden to families; further ingraining the cultural understanding that females are inferior. In many cultures all around the world marriage is still pretty much the same. Marriage has been about ownership, status, politics, and business…but not love. Love is a very new understanding as a purpose or requirement for marriage, and the fact that it is at all means that we have already redefined marriage. So I am exceedingly relieved, that if marriage is to exist at all that, in this country at least, it is being redefined, as a union of mutual love and partnership between two consenting adults, no matter their sex/gender.  

It has been said a million times by all those who are rational, but it is still true, that it really shouldn’t matter who you love. The political right screams about small government and freedoms, but they ignore those words when it comes to dictating who you can marry, a woman’s reproductive rights, or the substances you can consume. The hypocritical right wing is fed by the fears and prejudices of an ignorant populace fooled by lunacy that is ages old, and in almost all the social problems I come across I see the same core issue…lack of education. I do not just mean school; I speak of a general lack of understanding and working knowledge of the world and a failure to see past one’s own limited experience. Knowledge is the finest cure against any prejudice. If only knowing were valued more than following, if only questioning were more valued than obeying. Hate is taught; it is not innate, whereas the inclination to explore is perfectly natural and should be nourished. So parents, please teach your children to appreciate the variety of life and seek a deeper understanding in all things and people, so that we may create a future where bigotry and prejudice is a thing of the past. Now is the time to give justice to the homosexual community and give them the same rights and legal protection that heterosexuals have always had. 



“Whenever the people are for gay marriage or medical marijuana or assisted suicide, suddenly the "will of the people" goes out the window.”   ~Bill Maher




Join me on ...

Twitter @ladyrhiannon824

Read my blog at The Daily Kos  at http://www.dailykos.com/....

Youtube channel at http://www.youtube.com/....

Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/....

Read my blog at http://ladyrhiannon824.blogspot.com/

Google+ at Rhiannon Avaneen






Saturday, February 2, 2013

Europe Bans Cosmetic Tests on Animals



VICTORY! Europe Marks the End of Cosmetic Tests on Animals

By The Lady Rhiannon


         There is great news for animal advocates out there. The European Union has announced that they have passed legislation that will effectively ban of the sale, import, or manufacture of any and all cosmetics that have been tested on animals. The ban is set to take effect starting March 11 of 2013. Anyone who wants to sell cosmetics, including toiletries such as toothpaste, deodorant, and soap, in Europe must ensure that there are no ingredients anywhere in the product that have been tested on animals. This is a HUGE breakthrough for animal rights activists and, of course, the animals we fight to protect.
        This victory has been the culmination of a two decade long effort by the “Cruelty Free International” charity foundation and the cruelty-free retailer “The Body Shop”. Together they have launched an international campaign to end animal testing and promote cruelty-free products. So far 55 countries have signed a pledge in support of the ban. The organization has indicated that one of their next main targets is China, which still requires such animal tests for cosmetic products. Of course, there is still a large amount of testing in America as well. However, there is a lot of hope for the United States because the Food and Drug Administration does not require product testing on animals.

        It is difficult to get a clear answer as to how many animals are used in cosmetic tests each year because there is very little regulation of such things and most countries do not have laws requiring corporations or experimenters to keep track of the number of animals used. Modest estimates are in the hundreds of thousands worldwide every year; thousands die a year in the United States alone. The clearest estimates I could find were for all lab animals used for cosmetics, medicine, and all other products, which is between 14 and 70 million animals worldwide in any given year. Cats, dogs, mice, rats, and rabbits are often used to test the irritancy and toxicity of cosmetic products through painful exposure experiments.

         All of the experiments are cruel, painful, and unnecessary. For example, they typically drip chemicals into the eyes of rabbits to test a product’s sensitivity. This can cause soreness, swelling, bleeding from the eyes, and blindness. It is also common practice to manually pump substances into the lungs or stomachs of dogs, cats, rats, and other animals until the animals die or the experimenters are otherwise satisfied with the experiment. That test is called “Acute oral toxicity” testing, and the animals in this experiment who do not die often suffer from seizures, paralysis, diarrhea, and/or bleeding from the mouth or throat. The “Acute dermal toxicity” test is when they apply a substance to the shaved skin of a rat, guinea pig, or rabbit, and cover it to prevent the animal from licking the chemicals off. Both the Acute oral and the acute dermal tests are designed to figure out the amount of substance needed to kill at least half of the exposed animals within two weeks’ time. Over 50% of all animals used in cosmetic tests die within three weeks.

         If the animals do not die in any given experiment, they are either euthanized or reused in the next experiment. The list of experiments (usually involving forced inhalation or consumption of dangerous substances) goes on and on. They even expose pregnant animals to various chemicals to test for birth defect. These are pointless, unnecessary tests that really prove nothing about the effect a product will have on a person. Animals are simply too different than humans for animal tests to be practically applicable. There is no logical reason for these animals to suffer for our vanity and I am so glad that Europe has made this leap in their part to end the madness and I too hope the world will follow suit.

        There are literally dozens of tests now available that can usually cheaper and always more dependable than the results of animal tests. Companies like EpiSkin, EpiDerm, and SkinEThic have developed the technology of artificial human skin. We can test substances on human blood given by volunteers for also. “The Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test” and “Isolated Chicken Eye Test” use eyes of slaughtered animals from the meat industry to test the potential irritation a product could cause to eyes. This not only saves countless rats, rabbits, and guinea pigs, but also makes good use of what otherwise would go to waste.

        The Chief Executive of Cruelty Free International, Michelle Thew, said of the European animal testing ban, “This is truly an historic event and the culmination of over 20 years of campaigning. Now we will apply our determination and vision on a global stage to ensure that the rest of the world follows this lead.” This is a controversial topic, but one that does not get a lot of attention in the news. Animals are easy to ignore because they do not talk, but they matter. Many people cannot bear to face the reality because it is so ugly, but that means that you care enough to do something about it.         
        You can get involved with the fight in many ways; sign petitions and pledges, email your congressmen for stricter animal protection legislation, and make sure to buy cruelty free products. Many products say “cruelty free” on the back, but you can also visit the Human Society website to get a free list of animal safe products as well as brands of which to stay clear. These companies will reject animal testing if we genuinely reject THEM for it. Remember, you vote with your money, so please be mindful of your choices. These animals cannot fight for themselves; we are the only ones who can make this vital change…a necessary change, a worthy change, and relatively easy change to make.



Join me on ...

Twitter @ladyrhiannon824

Read my blog at The Daily Kos  at http://www.dailykos.com/....

Youtube channel at http://www.youtube.com/....

Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/....

Read my blog at http://ladyrhiannon824.blogspot.com/

Google+ at Rhiannon Avaneen



worked cited:





Saturday, January 19, 2013

Save Money and Save a Life!

The Lady Rhiannon

 Second video from my channel...

"Save Money and Save a Life"...


Don't buy from breeders or pet stores. Save a life by rescuing from the shelter or the street. It is worth it. Please "like" and share...

Join me on twitter @ladyrhiannon824

Facebook.com/LadyRhiannon824

www.ladyrhiannon824.blogspot.com

Find me on the Daily Kos @ladyrhiannon824

For more information on this topic.....

(2012). Pet statistics. ASPCA. Retrieved from http://www.aspca.org/about-us/faq/pet-statistics.aspx
Common questions about animal shelters (2011, December 9). Human Society. Retrieved from http://www.humanesociety.org/animal_community/resources
Healthypet.com. (2011, 12 02). Retrieved from http://www.healthypet.com/PetCare/PetCareArticle.aspx?title=Why_Do_Pets_End_Up_in_Shelters

Lady Rhiannon YouTube

      "Gun Control in America"

          From my NEW channel on Youtube:

        The Lady Rhiannon


This is my first video ever. My purpose for this channel is social and political commentary and today my focus is on gun control issues. I hope you enjoy! Please subscribe and hit the LIKE button on YouTube please!!!

Join me on ...


Twitter @ladyrhiannon824

Read my blog at The Daily Kos  at http://www.dailykos.com/....

Youtube channel at http://www.youtube.com/....

Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/....

Read my blog at http://ladyrhiannon824.blogspot.com/

Google+ at Rhiannon Avaneen

Friday, November 30, 2012

Guns in America



Guns in America:

The Vital Importance of Strengthening Gun Control in the United States

by Lady Rhiannon


 Gun laws and gun controls are far too weak in the Unites States, and the federal government needs to instill and enforce federal regulations to make gun purchases and ownership safer.  Gun control is not a threat to our freedom, and no reasonable group is calling for guns to be taken away from sane, responsible citizens, but logical changes need to be made. The United States has the highest per capita rate and the highest sheer number of gun deaths and murders in the world, but better laws can change that (Violence Policy Center 2010).  Many people are not aware of how weak gun control laws are in the United States. Over 60% of all murders in the Unites states are committed with firearms. Research shows that the implementation of stronger gun control laws leads to restricted availability to criminals and would-be criminals, and reduces the number of gun deaths, murders, and other felony use (National Criminal Justice Reference Service 1994).  Unfortunately, propaganda and misinformation has been presented to the public by the NRA and weapons manufactures, and their congressional lobbying keeps the pressure on politicians to avoid implementing new federal or state weapons restrictions and regulations (Marty and Sugarmann 2012).
From a global perspective our gun laws are extremely sparse and  loose. Finland has relatively relaxed gun laws in comparison with the rest of Europe; even a fifteen year old can get a gun with parental consent (Associated Press 2008). However, Unlike the United States, Finland has federal regulations requiring gun licensing for owners, as well as gun registration requirements. In Finland approximately 50% of households have guns, while in the United States in 2002, only 41% of household had guns. In spite of that, Finland’s per capita death rate (6.65 per 100,000 people) was less than half that of the country that came in first place for the highest gun death rate in the world with 13.47, which was the United States of America (Public Broadcasting Station 2002).

The United States of America has more guns than any other country in the world. Even though the percentage of known gun owners and households with guns has fallen by about ten percent in the last decade, many gun owners hoard and collect a huge number of guns. A 2004 National Firearms Survey study found that 20% of gun owners own about 65% of the nation's guns. Also, in 2007 the U.N's Office on Drugs and Crime found that the United States owns 50% of the world's guns, despite being only 5% of the world’s population (Brennan, 2012). So fewer people now own a greater number of guns.

In 2007, 3,007 children died as a result of a firearm. 2,186 of those deaths were deemed homicides, while most of the others were deemed either accidents or suicides (National MCH Center for Child Death Review 2007). There were 127,521 known cases of robbery with a firearm reported in 2010 by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. That number is approximately six times the number of robberies committed with a knife or by “other means” (Federal Bureau of Investigation 2011). Also in 2010, there were 12,996 convicted cases of murder in the United States and 8,775 of them were committed with a firearm (FBI 2010).

  The number of murders committed with a gun dwarfs in comparison to the number for all known cases of gun deaths, including accidents, suicides, murders, and homicides not legally considered murder. In 2009 there were 31,347 people in total in the United States who died as a result of a firearm. That is a per capita rate of 10.2 people out of every 100,000 in the population, which is coming close to the motor vehicle death rate of 11.2 (Center for Disease Control 2012).  One argument against gun control has been that cars kill more people each year than guns do, but stronger traffic laws, car safety regulations, and continued testing and licensing requirements account for a steady decline in highway fatalities. Now gun deaths outnumber car fatalities in ten states including Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, Virginia, and Michigan (Sugermann 2012).  

Cars are usually necessary for daily adult functioning, while guns are not. A gun’s sole purpose is to maim and kill, while a car’s primary purpose is for transportation. More cars are used on a more constant basis than guns, so the ratio of gun fatalities to gun owners is significantly higher than the ratio of car fatalities to car owners. About 90% of Americans have a car, leading the world in car ownership (Auckland, 2007), while only 32% of households own guns, according to a 2011 study  done by The University of Chicago's National Opinion Research Center (Brennan, 2012). Still the number of people who die in car wrecks is almost equal to those who die from gunshots. 

We license people to drive through safety tests, road tests, eye exams, and a background check. To drive a car you need insurance and your car has to be registered with a visible serial number and license plates. We also have traffic laws for every situation faced on the streets and highways. Yet we do not bear the same legal or socially cautious regard for deadly weapons. Thirty-four states in this country do not require a state license to buy, own, or use a firearm. Only Sixteen states require state licensing, including Massachusetts, Hawaii, New Jersey, New York, and California. These states experience a significantly lower per capita gun death rate than the states with the fewest gun laws (Violence Policy Center 2010). The only states that require a permit to purchase all firearms are Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, and New Jersey, and New York (“Brady Campaign 2011 Scorecards”, 2011). Arkansas, Wyoming, and Arizona do not even require a permit to carry a concealed weapon in public (“Gun Laws”, 2012).

Most states, including Florida, Texas, Ohio, Montana, New Mexico, West Virginia, and Arizona do not have any laws regarding record keeping, theft report mandates, purchase limits, storage security requirements, store inspections, background checks, safety training, or licensing; of these things Mississippi only has record keeping requirements for store owners, but that does not apply to independent sellers online or at gun shows. Only California, Maryland, and New Jersey have and enforce all of the laws just mentioned. Rhode Island, Minnesota, Massachusetts, Hawaii, Connecticut, and California are the only states with safety training or testing requirements of any kind. Florida is unique in that it is the only state which currently has a gag law placed on doctors. This law forbids doctors from asking patients if they own a firearm, or to educate their patients on proper gun safety or the possible dangers of owning and using a gun (“Brady Campaign 2011 Scorecards”, 2011).

One common misconception is that gun laws will not have an impact on crime, as criminals will always find access to weapons, but this is not the case. According to an academic study performed by the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, “In the five year period before enactment of the Federal Assault Weapons Act (1990-1994), assault weapons named in the Act constituted 4.82% of the crime gun traces ATF conducted nationwide. Since the law’s enactment, however, these assault weapons have made up only 1.61% of the guns ATF has traced to crime—a drop of 66% from the pre-ban rate. Moreover, ATF trace data show a steady year-by-year decline in the percentage of assault weapons traced, suggesting that the longer the statute has been in effect, the less available these guns have become for criminal misuse." (Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence 2004)

The states that have the most gun laws in the Unites States, such as licensing requirements, consistently experience a lower rate of gun deaths within that state. In 2009, Massachusetts, Hawaii, New Jersey, New York, and Connecticut had the lowest per capita gun death rates in the United States. Massachusetts was lowest in the country at 3.14 and Connecticut was highest among these five at 4.92. All the aforementioned states are some of the few states with enforced gun laws including permit and licensing requirements (“Brady Campaign 2011 Scorecards”, 2011). Louisiana, Wyoming, Alabama, Montana, and Mississippi have very few gun laws and have the highest per capita gun death rates in the country. According to 2009 numbers, Louisiana rated highest in the country at 18.03 and Mississippi rated 16.5 deaths per 100,000 people (Violence Policy Center 2010).

Mourners visit memorials for Aurora victims.
Also, many fatal gun crimes are committed by those who purchased the weapons in a legal manner, or acquired them from friends or relatives who did. James Holmes, the shooter from Aurora, CO, purchased all of his weapons legally without a background check, purchase registration, or permit. He bought an assault rifle, a shotgun, two handguns, 6,000 rounds of ammunition, and a 100 round magazine. He was wearing a bullet proof vest, and he had smoke grenades, 350 shells for his 12-gauge shotgun, and a gas mask (Healy, July 2012). He killed 12 people and injured 58 others, he could have killed many others but his clip jammed and he had to switch to a slower weapon. Ammunition is especially easy to acquire in large amounts online. There are no laws requiring records to be kept for ammunition sales except in New Jersey and Washington D.C. (Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence 2012). Only a few states like Illinois, Massachusetts and New Jersey, and a few cities, enforce limitations on ammunition purchases, and at least require permits for buyers or licenses for sellers (Healy 2012).

The Second Amendment is an important right, but even the First Amendment does not give a person rights to spread libel and slander about others, and you are not allowed to enter into a crowded theater and shout fire either. With all rights there are responsibilities and exceptions to those rights. The second amendment also does not exclude the premise of regulation as the amendment precisely states, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The qualifier of militia is “well-regulated” (Cornell Law School, 2012). The founding fathers could also never have predicted the advances in technology that have produced exponentially deadly weapons capable of killing dozens and even hundreds of people at one time.

We need licensing requirements for owning and using any type of fire arm. Getting that license should take at least as much effort as earning a driver’s license. Getting a license should require safety training, range tests, eye exams, a mental health analysis, and background checks.  Background checks should be required for dealers as well, and all gun sales need to be registered as all car sales are. Registration would make it easier to track guns back to the original owner, and even if the gun was stolen, investigators would get one step closer to apprehending the real offender. We also need to reinstate the assault weapons ban because that has already been shown to reduce the number of deaths and crimes involving assault weapons (BCPGV 2004). Laws such as these are part of the reason countries in Europe and Canada enjoy a lower rate of gun deaths and gun violence, but still a great portion of households in these countries are secure gun owners (PBS 2002).

Even gun owning Americans, when asked about specific gun control issues, agree with basic, common sense gun control laws. According to a poll of 945 gun owners, including NRA members, 87% of gun owners are in favor of criminal background checks for buyers and owners, and 80% are in favor for background checks for shop employees as well. Seventy-one Percent of gun owners polled and 64 percent of NRA members would be in favor of a mandate for people to report when their gun is stolen. Eighty-four percent of gun owners support permits and safety requirements for carrying concealed weapons, and most of them support a 21 year age minimum as well (Beauchamp 2012). Yet many people still have a generally negative visceral reaction to the general, abstract concept of gun control and gun laws.

The main reason that we don’t have stricter gun control laws, like most of the rest of the first world countries do, is because of a concerted effort on part of the gun manufacturers and retailers to prevent such things from happening. Since 2005, corporations have contributed up to 52.6 million dollars to the NRA and up to 38.9 million of that came directly from the firearms industry. Executive Vice President, Wayne LaPierre promised at the time that his new Corporate Partners Program was designed to suit and appease corporate interests in order to create a strong alliance. Many weapons manufacturers hold powerful places of authority within the NRA itself, and both the National Rifle Association's investors and board members are committed to an uncompromising resistance to even the most conservative gun control laws (Marty and Sugarmann 2012).

NRA Board Member Pete Brownell, and owner of Brownells, “the world’s largest supplier of firearms accessories and gun-smithing tools,” said this on his website after making it on that board committee of the NRA: "Having [NRA] directors who intimately understand and work in leadership positions within the firearms industry ensures the NRA's focus is honed on the overall mission of the organization. These individuals bring a keen sense of the industry and of the bigger fight to the table". MidwayUSA founder Larry Potterfield, created what is called the NRA Round-Up program, which allows buyers to “round-up” their purchase to the nearest dollar with the difference going to the NRA. This amounted to over five million dollars that went to the NRA legal branch for lobbying costs. MidwayUSA, a very lucrative ammunition, gun, and weapons supply company, also served as “the Official Sponsor of the NRA Annual Meeting and Exhibits” for two years in a row. There are 22 corporate "partners" in what is known as the "Ring of Freedom" including,  Arsenal, Inc., Benelli, Beretta USA Corporation, Browning, DPMS Panther Arms, Doug Turnbull Restoration, Inc., and many others including 12 who make assault weapons (Marty and Sugarmann 2012).

The National Rifle Association represents itself as a representative for the average American gun owner, but in reality they receive most of their funding from large scale weapons manufacturers and companies involved with the sale of firearms, and their interests are in corporate profit. These contributors seek to make the biggest profit possible by selling as many weapons and as much ammunition as possible. They have a deep incentive to make sure that weapon accessibility remains easy and legal. So these corporations align themselves with the NRA by funding almost their entire organization so that the NRA can better fight any impending legislation against weapons, both in the courts and in the media (Marty and Sugarmann 2012).

There is an inordinately high amount of gun deaths and violence in the United States. It is shocking how few laws exist in this country in most states, and it is irresponsible for such deadly weapons to go so unregulated. Gun laws are a logical, affective method of reducing gun deaths and gun crimes without violating the rights of responsible American people to bear arms if they so choose. Unfortunately, misinformation and corporate lobbying prevent most gun regulations from passing into laws. Therefore, it is imperative that the public be educated with the facts, in hopes that the informed masses can put pressure on the legislators to pass laws in spite of corporate opposition; ultimately it is up to the people to make a difference. As Margaret Mead once said, “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has (Lutkehaus 2008)”. It is our safety and security, and the security of our civilization that is at stake.

Join me on ...

Twitter @ladyrhiannon824

Read my blog at The Daily Kos  at http://www.dailykos.com/....

Youtube channel at http://www.youtube.com/....

Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/....

Read my blog at http://ladyrhiannon824.blogspot.com/

Google+ at Rhiannon Avaneen
Art Portfolio - www.ladyrhiannon824.deviantart.com











Works Cited



“America’s Ammunition Crisis: Few Laws Exist to Prevent Purchases by Dangerous People Online and in Stores.” Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. 30 July. 2012.  Retrieved 9-10-2012 from <http://smartgunlaws.org/americas-ammunition-crisis-few-laws-exist-to-prevent-purchases-by-dangerous-people-online-and-in-stores/>

Associated Press. “Facts and Figures about Finland’s Gun Culture”. 2008. 23 Sept. Retrieved 10-27-2012 from <http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/world/2008-09-23-238953446_x.htm>

Auckland. “Americans Leads the World in Car Ownership”. scoop.co.nz. 2007. May 27.  Retrieved 10-27-2012 from <http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO0705/S00103.htm>

Beauchamp, Zack. “NRA Members Agree: More Gun Regulation Makes Sense”. Think Progress. 24 July. 2012. Retrieved 10-1-2012 from <http://thinkprogress.org/election/2012/07/24/577091/nra-members-agree-regulating-guns-makes-sense/> 

 “Brady Campaign 2011 Scorecards.” Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. (2011). Retrieved 10-1-2012 from <http://www.bradycampaign.org/xshare/stateleg/scorecard/2011/2011_scoring_system.pdf>

Brennan, A. “Analysis: Fewer U.S. Gun Owners Own More Guns”. 2012. 31 July. Retrieved 10-27-2012 from <http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/31/politics/gun-ownership-declining/index.html>

Center for Disease Control and Prevention. “Fast Stats: All Injuries”. 2012. 20 August. Retrieved 10-26-2012 from <http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/injury.htm>

Cornell Law School. “Legal Information Institute”. 2012. 10 January. Retrieved 10-30-2012 from <http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/second_amendment>

“Gun Laws”. NRA Institute for Legislative Action. (2012). Retrieved 10-4-2012 from <http://www.nraila.org/gun-laws.aspx> 

Healy, Jack. “Suspect Bought Large Stockpile of Rounds Online.” New York Times. 22 July. 2012. Retrieved 9-30-2012 from <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/23/us/online-ammunition-sales-highlighted-by-aurora-shootings.html?_r=0>

“International Gun Laws”. Public Broadcasting Station: Politics and Economy. 15 November. 2002. Retrieved 9-27-2012 from <http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/internatgun.html>

Lutkehaus, Nancy C. “Margaret Mead: The Making of an American Icon”. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (2008). p. 261.

Marty, L., and Sugarmann, J. “Blood Money: How the Gun Industry Bankrolls the NRA.”  Violence Policy Center. (2011). Retrieved 10-4-2012 from <http://www.vpc.org/studies/bloodmoney.pdf>

 “On Target: The Impact of the 1994 Assault Weapon Act.” Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence. Crime Gun Solutions LLC. (2004). Retrieved 10-4-2012 <http://www.bradycenter.org/xshare/pdf/reports/on_target.pdf>

Roth, Jeffrey A., “Firearms and Violence.” National Criminal Justice Reference Service. (1994, December) Retrieved 10-2-2012 from <https://www.ncjrs.gov/txtfiles/fireviol.txt>

 “State Firearm Death Rates, Ranked by Rate, 2009.” Violence Policy Center. (2010). Retrieved 10-6-2012 from <http://www.vpc.org/fadeathchart12.htm>

Sugermann, Josh. “Gun Deaths Exceed Motor Vehicle Deaths in 10 States. “ Huffington Post. 22 May. 2012. Retrieved 10-4-2012 <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/josh-sugarmann/gun-deaths-exceed-motor-v_b_1536793.html>

“Uniform Crime Reports: Crime in the U.S.”. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Table 19. (2011). Retrieved 9-30-2012 <http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/tables/10tbl19.xls>

 “Uniform Crime Reports: Crime in the U.S.”. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Table 20. (2010). Retrieved 9-30-2012 from <http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/tables/10tbl20.xls>

 “United States Child Mortality, 2007.” National MCH Center for Child Death Review. (2007). Retrieved 10-4-2012 from <http://www.childdeathreview.org/nationalchildmortalitydata.htm>


Thursday, October 4, 2012

Rhiannon on TYTCommunity

PLEASE WATCH AND SHARE! TYTCommunity... the true Mitt Romney....

Starring Kimani David, Jeff Waldorf, and ME!...The Lady Rhiannon, Rhiannon Avaneen
 This is my first of hopefully many more appearances from The Young Turks Network called TYTCommunity, where different, mostly liberal, people from all walks of life come together and discuss progressive and social issues of the week, or month. See us on Youtube and don't forget to watch the BEST news network anywhere! 
The Young Turks @9-11 pm EST on Youtube